BIS research focuses on policy issues of core interest to the central bank and financial supervisory community. The purpose of Pillar 3 disclosures is to provide information on banking institutions' risk management practices and regulatory capital ratios. Some present challenges, for sure, but they can be turned into opportunities with an openminded, farsighted approach that makes the most of what is known today, while doing as well as possible to prepare for a tomorrow that may be even harder to predict than it was yesterday. This material does not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situations or needs and is not intended as a recommendation, offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security, financial instrument, or strategy. The Pillar 3 framework provides a comprehensive package of all existing disclosure requirements, beyond those for regulatory capital requirements. Establish a handful of key points of interest ESG objectives to be acted upon at the operation and process level and assess them using the Green Asset Ratio (GAR) and Banking Book Taxonomy Alignment Ratio (BTAR), whichmeasure how well a banks activities conform to EU green standards and climate goals,respectively, as metrics for your portfolio. Updates to the Data Point Model (DPM) Version 3.2. All rights reserved. Our solutions for regulated financial departments and institutions help customers meet their obligations to external regulators. The Pillar 3 disclosure reports may be appended to, or form a discrete section of, a bank's financial reporting, but must be easily identifiable to users. These are followed by chapters presenting disclosure requirements for each risk type (credit risk, market risk, interest rate risk in the banking book, operational risk, leverage risk and liquidity risk) and its components (such as credit risk, counterparty credit risk, securitisation and credit valuation adjustment risk). ACPR informed that a new version of the Functional Business Card was made available on the OneGate portal on May 22, 2023. 29 March 2017 | Status: Consolidated PDF full text (1,962kb) | 82 pages FR (pdf, 662kb) ES (pdf, 1121kb) Topics: Disclosure Note This standard has been integrated into the consolidated Basel Framework . This time should be used to gather information, build your data collection capabilities and hone your allocation process. A world that runs on sunshine and a stiff breeze may seem ideal, but extending an inordinate amount of credit to try to bring it about may not be. As Basel 3 is implemented at the jurisdictional level, not all regulatory agencies require the same measures or levels of detail in their disclosure requirements. In such cases, the bank needs to indicate where the disclosure can be found. Whatever path you set your institution on, do not blindly follow it without checking the map and a compass frequently along the way. 'pillars': Pillar 1, minimum capital requirements; Pillar 2, supervisory review process; and Pillar 3, market discipline. The first chapter refers to the scope of application of the standard, to definitions and to requirements on location, frequency and timing of disclosures, along with assurance considerations and guiding principles to promote high-quality disclosures. Insurance and annuity products are offered through Merrill Lynch Life Agency Inc. (MLLA), a licensed insurance agency and wholly-owned subsidiary of BofA Corp. Investment products offered through MLPF&S and insurance and annuity products offered through MLLA: "Bank of America" is the marketing name for the global banking and global markets business of Bank of America Corporation. Enabling tax and accounting professionals and businesses of all sizes drive productivity, navigate change, and deliver better outcomes. Signposting can only be used if the data quality assurance of the separate document is at least equivalent to that required for the Pillar 3 report. Amid such lingering uncertainty, you should not devote too much time, capital or faith to a single vendor,method or technology solution. To that end, Pillar 3 of the Basel Framework lays out a comprehensive set of public disclosure requirements that seek to provide market participants with sufficient information to assess an internationally active bank's material risks and capital adequacy. While the EBA ESG Pillar 3 requirements currently focus on climate change risk, disclosure may expand to quantitative disclosure of other ESG factors. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) has long believed that it is important to encourage market discipline by way of meaningful disclosure of the key risks borne by internationally active banks. Certain links may direct you away from Bank of America to an unaffiliated site. While many specifics in the disclosures regimen remain to be settled, there are clear expectations covering data delivery and reports tied to the calendar. Download Transcript (PDF, 131 KB)(opens in a new tab). It will also help establish best practices at an international level. With workflows optimized by technology and guided by deep domain expertise, we help organizations grow, manage, and protect their businesses and their clients businesses. Here's how it works: We gather information about your online activities, such as the searches you conduct on our Sites and the pages you visit. The Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio remained stable at 15.1% (December 2020: 15.1%) as a result of an increase in CET1 capital by 1.2bn to The Pillar 3 report may be appended to, or form a discrete section of, a bank's financial reporting, but it must be easily identifiable to users. How to ensure a smooth transition from BowTieXP to BowTieXP Enterprise. 2023 Wolters Kluwer N.V. and/or its subsidiaries. A bank will have to determine just how green it intends to be with respect to its lending and investment practices, and its reputation. With submission of the first full report scheduled for March of 2023, based on data that they are already supposed to be gathering, firms have little time to spare to prepare their people and processes for the new requirements. The BIS's mission is to support central banks' pursuit of monetary and financial stability through international cooperation, and to act as a bank for central banks. .link:hover{text-decoration: underline !important;}. The European Banking Authority (EBA) has joined the effort by publishing technical standards on Pillar 3 disclosures for institutions in the European Union. Terms of Use (QuoteMedia). If you add all these data, systems, governance and dry-run demands together, now is the time to get moving if you haven't already. A template generally contains quantitative data that are disclosed according to specified definitions and often accompanied by an explanatory narrative. Pillar 3 allows disclosures to be specified as either fixed or flexible format templates or tables. New scenarios will have to be considered, models will need updating. The EBA ESG Pillar 3 disclosure standards require banks with securities traded on a regulated market of any EU member state to report information about climate risks in four main categories starting in 2023: Exposure to carbon-related assets and assets subject to climate change-related risks, including transition and physical risks, Support for counterparties through the low-carbon transition and in climate adaptation, Key performance indicators on sustainable finance activity based on the EU Taxonomy, How banks integrate ESG considerations into governance, business, strategy and risk management. . Prioritize near-term reporting deadlines, starting with the templates due in 2023. That is especially true if many banks have the same idea. Continual assessment will tell you how much adjustment you still have to make to meet your carbon intensity, financed emissions and other objectives, and which levers to pull to make your targets and get back on track if you have strayed. There are two distinct phases of regulatory reporting and each has different requirements. Serving legal professionals in law firms, General Counsel offices and corporate legal departments with data-driven decision-making tools. It incorporates MSCI SFDR Adverse Impact Metrics and MSCI EU Taxonomy Alignment. The reporting frequency for each disclosure requirement is set out in the table in While there is no obligation to have these disclosures audited, these must, at a minimum, be subject to the same level of internal review and control as the information used for the management's discussion and analysis section in their financial reports. Keep track of your data over time on GAR/BTAR metrics to see how well you are progressing from your starting point to significant targets, such as the 50 percent reduction in carbon emissions by 2030 called for under the 2015 Paris Agreement. Following the recent updates to the regulatory frameworks for credit institutions and investment firms, and the publication in 2018 of the European Commissions action plan on sustainable finance, the EBA is implementing a new policy strategy on institutions Pillar 3 disclosures that seeks to increase efficiency of institutions disclosures and reinforce market discipline by developing a comprehensive framework with consistent and comparable disclosures. Reporting Date. Lending, derivatives, and other commercial banking activities are performed globally by banking affiliates of Bank of America Corporation, including Bank of America, N.A., Member FDIC. Meanwhile, as you start back-office projects, always factor the new ESG reports into your processes. Pillar 3 Regulatory Liquidity Disclosures. Status: Adopted and published on the Official Journal, Status: Final draft adopted by the EBA and submitted to the European Commission, Status: Final and translated into the EU official languages, European Forum for Innovation Facilitators, Discussion Paper on management and supervision of ESG risks for credit institutions and investment firms, EBA regulation and institutional framework, Conflicts of interest of members of the governing bodies and other committees, Occupational activities after leaving the EBA, Current procurement procedures with a value of 140,000 or more, Current procurement procedures between 15,000 and 140,000, Archived Information on ex-post publicity, EBA at a glance: key achievements in 2020 and future priorities, Implementing FSB Key Attributes on resolution matters, Guidelines on Accounting for Expected Credit, Guidelines on communication between competent authorities and auditors, Regulatory Technical Standards on methods of prudential consolidation, Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism, Call for input on de-risking and its impact on access to financial services, Guidelines on ML/TF risk factors (revised), Guidelines on cooperation and information exchange between prudential supervisors, AML/CFT supervisors and financial intelligence units, Guidelines on policies and controls for the effective management of ML/TF risks when providing access to financial services, Guidelines on risk factors and simplified and enhanced customer due diligence, Guidelines on risk-based supervision (First revision), Guidelines on risk-based supervision (Second revision), Guidelines on the role of AML/CFT compliance officers, Guidelines on the use of remote customer onboarding solutions, JC Guidelines on cooperation and information exchange for AML/CFT supervision purposes, Joint Guidelines to prevent transfers of funds can be abused for ML and TF, Regulatory Technical Standards on CCP to strengthen fight against financial crime, Regulatory Technical Standards on a central database on AML/CFT in the EU, Regulatory Technical Standards on the implementation of group wide AML/CFT policies in third countries, Guidelines for cooperation between consolidating supervisors and host supervisors, Guidelines for the joint assessment and joint decision regarding the capital adequacy of cross-border groups, Guidelines for the operational functioning of colleges, Implementing Technical Standards on joint decisions on institution-specific prudential requirements, Implementing technical standards on joint decisions on prudential requirements, Recommendation amending EBA/Rec/2015/01 on the equivalence of confidentiality regimes, Regulatory and implementing technical standards on the functioning of colleges of supervisors, Regulatory technical standards on colleges of supervisors for investment firms groups, Technical Standards on the functioning of supervisory colleges under CRD, Consumer protection and financial innovation, Decision on specifying the benchmark rate under the Mortgage Credit Directive, Discussion Paper on automation in financial advice, Discussion Paper on innovative uses of consumer data by financial institutions, Discussion paper on draft requirements on passport notifications for credit intermediaries, Extension of the application of the Joint Committee Guidelines on complaints-handling to the new institutions under PSD2 and MCD, Guidelines for complaints-handling for the securities (ESMA) and banking (EBA) sectors, Guidelines on creditworthiness assessment, Guidelines on product oversight and governance arrangements for retail banking products, Guidelines on remuneration policies for sales staff, Guidelines on standardised fee terminology for payment accounts in the EU, Guidelines on the security of internet payments, Regulatory Technical Standards on Individual Portfolio Management of loans offered by crowdfunding service providers, Regulatory Technical Standards on Professional Indemnity Insurance (PII) for mortgage credit intermediaries, Regulatory Technical Standards on credit scoring and loan pricing disclosure, credit risk assessment and risk management requirements for Crowdfunding Service Providers, Regulatory Technical Standards on the content and presentation of the KIDs for PRIIPs, Technical Advice on possible delegated acts on criteria and factors for intervention powers concerning structured deposits, Technical Standards on standardised terminology and disclosure documents under the PAD, Discussion Paper and Call for Evidence on SMEs and the SME Supporting Factor, Discussion Paper on the future of the IRB Approach, Discussion paper on the role of environmental risks in the prudential framework, Guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria on loan repayments applied in the light of the COVID-19 crisis, Guidelines on loan origination and monitoring, Guidelines on management of non-performing and forborne exposures, Guidelines on specification of types of exposures to be associated with high risk, Guidelines on the application of the definition of default, Guidelines on the implementation, validation and assessment of Advanced Measurement (AMA) and Internal Ratings Based (IRB) Approaches, Implementing Technical Standards on NPL transaction data templates, Mechanistic references to credit ratings in the ESAs guidelines and recommendations, Regulatory Technical Standards concerning the assessment of appropriateness of risk weights and minimum LGD values, Regulatory Technical Standards in relation to credit valuation adjustment risk, Regulatory Technical Standards on assessment methodology for IRB approach, Regulatory Technical Standards on conditions for capital requirements for mortgage exposures, Regulatory Technical Standards on materiality threshold of credit obligation past due, Regulatory Technical Standards on the calculation of credit risk adjustments, Regulatory Technical Standards on the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings (CIUs), Regulatory Technical Standards on the method for the identification of the geographical location of the relevant credit exposures under Article 140(7) of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), Regulatory Technical Standards on the treatment of equity exposures under the IRB Approach, Regulatory technical standards on disclosure of information related to the countercyclical capital buffer, Regulatory technical standards on specialised lending exposures, Regulatory technical standards on the permanent and temporary use of IRB approach, External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAI), Decision on the Use of Unsolicited Credit Assessments, Guidelines on the recognition of External Credit Assessment Institutions (repealed), Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of ECAIs Credit Assessments for securitisation positions, Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of ECAIs credit assessments under the SA, Consultation on the Joint Committee response to the Call for Advice on the Fundamental Review of the Financial Conglomerates Directive (FICOD) received from the European Commission in April 2011, Guidelines on the convergence of supervisory practices relating to the consistency of supervisory coordination arrangements for financial conglomerates, Implementing Technical Standards on the reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration for financial conglomerates, Regulatory Technical Standards on risk concentration and intra-group transactions within financial conglomerates, Regulatory Technical Standards on the uniform conditions of application of the calculation methods for determining the amount of capital required at the level of the financial conglomerate, Guidelines on ICT and security risk management, Guidelines on Internal Governance (repealed), Guidelines on internal governance (revised), Guidelines on internal governance (second revision), Guidelines on internal governance for investment firms, Guidelines on the assessment of adequate knowledge and experience of the management or administrative organ of credit servicers, Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders (repealed), Guidelines on the benchmarking of diversity practices including diversity policies and gender pay gap, Joint Committee Guidelines on on the system for the exchange of information relevant to fit and proper assessments, Joint ESMA and EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body (revised), Joint ESMA and EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body, Recommendations on outsourcing to cloud service providers (repealed), Guidelines on liquidity requirements exemption for investment firms, Implementing Technical Standards on the format, structure, contents list and annual publication date of the supervisory information to be disclosed by competent authorities under Article 57(4) of IFD, New prudential regime for investment firms, Regulatory Technical Standards on prudential requirements for investment firms, Regulatory Technical Standards on the specific liquidity measurement for investment firms, Guidelines on common reporting of large exposures, Guidelines on conditions for the application of the alternative treatment of institutions exposures related to tri-party repurchase agreements, Guidelines on large exposures breaches and time and measures to return to compliance, Guidelines on limits on exposures to shadow banking, Guidelines on the revised large exposures regime, Implementation Guidelines on large exposures exemptions for money transmission, correspondent banking, clearing and settlement and custody services, Regulatory Technical Standards on criteria for the identification of shadow banking entities, Regulatory Technical Standards on the determination of the overall exposure to a client or a group of connected clients in respect of transactions with underlying assets, Regulatory Technical Standards on the identification of a group of connected clients, Regulatory Technical standards on the determination of indirect exposures to underlying clients of derivative and credit derivative contracts, Implementing Technical Standards on disclosure for leverage ratio, Defining Liquid Assets in the Liquidity Coverage ratio, Guidelines on Retail Deposits subject to higher outflows for the purposes of liquidity reporting, Guidelines on harmonised definitions and templates for funding plans of credit institutions, Guidelines on liquidity cost benefit allocation, Implementing Technical Standards amending ITS on additional liquidity monitoring metrics, Implementing Technical Standards on additional liquidity monitoring metrics, Implementing Technical Standards on currencies with an extremely narrow definition of central bank eligibility, Implementing Technical Standards on currencies with constraints on the availability of liquid assets (amended), Regulatory Technical Standards on additional liquidity outflows, Regulatory Technical Standards on criteria for a preferential treatment in cross-border intragroup financial support under LCR, Technical Standards on currencies with constraints on the availability of liquid assets, Regulatory Technical Standards on the margin periods for risk used for the treatment of clearing members' exposures to clients, Implementing Technical Standards On the Hypothetical Capital of a Central Counterparty (CCPs), Regulatory Technical Standards on IMMV under EMIR, Regulatory Technical Standards amending the bilateral margin requirements with regards to intragroup contracts, Regulatory Technical Standards on capital requirements for Central Counterparties (CCPs), Regulatory Technical Standards on prudential requirements for central securities depositories (CSDs), Regulatory Technical Standards on risk mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives not cleared by a central counterparty (CCP), Discussion Paper on EU implementation of MKR and CCR revised standards, Discussion paper on the treatment of structural FX under Article 352(2) of the CRR, Guidelines on Stressed Value-At-Risk (Stressed VaR), Guidelines on corrections to modified duration for debt instruments, Guidelines on criteria for the use of data inputs in the expected shortfall risk measure under the IMA, Guidelines on the Incremental Default and Migration Risk Charge (IRC), Guidelines on the treatment of CVA risk under SREP, Guidelines on the treatment of structural FX under 352(2) of the CRR, Implementing Technical Standards on appropriately diversified indices, Implementing Technical Standards on closely correlated currencies, Regulatory Technical Standards on gross jump-to-default amounts, Regulatory Technical Standards amending RTS on CVA proxy spread, Regulatory Technical Standards on Internal Model Approach for Assessment Methodology, Regulatory Technical Standards on default probabilities and losses given default for default risk model under the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book, Regulatory Technical Standards on emerging markets and advanced economies, Regulatory Technical Standards on exclusion from CVA of non-EU non-financial counterparties, Regulatory Technical Standards on non-delta risk of options in the standardised market risk approach, Regulatory Technical Standards on prudent valuation, Regulatory Technical Standards on residual risk add-on, Regulatory Technical Standards on the assessment methodology to verify an institutions compliance with the internal model approach, Regulatory Technical Standards on the capitalisation of non-modellable risk factors under the FRTB, Regulatory Technical Standards on the conditions for assessing the materiality of extensions and changes of internal approaches for credit, market and operational risk, Regulatory Technical Standards on the definition of market, Regulatory Technical Standards on the definition of materiality thresholds for specific risk in the trading book, Regulatory Technical Standards on the standardised approach for counterparty credit risk, Regulatory Technical Standards on the treatment of non-trading book positions subject to foreign-exchange risk or commodity risk, Technical Standards on the IMA under the FRTB, Discussion paper on machine learning for IRB models, Guidelines on Credit Risk Mitigation for institutions applying the IRB approach with own estimates of LGDs, Guidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and treatment of defaulted assets, Regulatory Technical Standards and Guidelines on estimation and identification of an economic downturn in IRB modelling, Regulatory Technical Standards on the conditions according to which competent authorities may grant permission for data waiver, Supervisory handbook for the validation of internal ratings based systems, Guidelines on operational risk mitigation techniques, Guidelines on the management of operational risk in market-related activities, Regulatory Technical Standards on assessment methodologies for the use of AMAs for operational risk, Discussion Paper on the impact on the volatility of own funds of the revised IAS 19 and the deduction of defined pension assets from own funds, Guidelines for Hybrid Capital Instruments, Guidelines on criteria to to assess other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs), Guidelines on instruments referred to in Article 57(a) of the CRD, Guidelines on prudential filters for regulatory capital, Guidelines on the specification and disclosure of systemic importance indicators, Implementing Technical Standards on Disclosure for Own Funds, Regulatory Technical Standards amending RTS on own funds and eligible liabilities, Regulatory Technical Standards on Own Funds, Regulatory Technical Standards on own funds requirements for investment firms, Regulatory Technical Standards on the prudential treatment of software assets, Technical Standards for the identification of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs), Technical Advice to the Commission on possible treatments of unrealised gains measured at fair value, Amended Regulatory Technical Standards and Implementing Technical Standards on passport notification, Guidelines for Passport Notifications for credit institutions, Guidelines on passport notifications for credit intermediaries, Guidelines on supervision of significant branches, Regulatory Technical Standards on passporting under PSD2, Technical Standards on Passport Notifications for credit institutions, Technical Standards on information exchange between home and host competent authorities, Technical standards on information exchange between home and host competent authorities of investment firms, Discussion Paper on the payment fraud data received under PSD2, Guidelines on the limited network exclusion under PSD2, Guidelines on authorisation and registration under PSD2, Guidelines on major incidents reporting under PSD2, Guidelines on procedures for complaints of alleged infringements of the PSD2, Guidelines on security measures for operational and security risks under the PSD2, Guidelines on the conditions to be met to benefit from an exemption from contingency measures under Article 33(6) of Regulation (EU) 2018/389 (RTS on SCA & CSC), Guidelines on the criteria on how to stipulate the minimum monetary amount of the professional indemnity insurance under PSD2, Regulatory Technical Standards on Home-Host cooperation under PSD2, Regulatory Technical Standards on central contact points under PSD2, Regulatory Technical Standards on payment card schemes and processing entities under the IFR, Regulatory Technical Standards on strong customer authentication and secure communication under PSD2, Technical Standards on the EBA Register under PSD2, Notifications on resolution cases and use of DGS funds, Cooperative Bank of Peloponnese Coop Ltd resolution case, Guidelines for institutions and resolution authorities on improving resolvability, Guidelines on Business Reorganisation Plans, Guidelines on cooperation agreements between deposit guarantee schemes, Guidelines on early intervention triggers, Guidelines on how information should be provided under the BRRD, Guidelines on measures to reduce or remove impediments to resolvability, Guidelines on methods for calculating contributions to Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGSs) (revised), Guidelines on methods for calculating contributions to Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGSs), Guidelines on stress tests of deposit guarantee schemes (first revision), Guidelines on stress tests of deposit guarantee schemes, Guidelines on the delineation and reporting of available financial means of Deposit Guarantee Schemes, Guidelines on the overall recovery capacity in recovery planning, Guidelines on the range of scenarios to be used in recovery plans, Guidelines on the rate of conversion of debt to equity in bail-in, Guidelines on the treatment of shareholders in bail-in, Guidelines on the types of tests, reviews or exercises that may lead to support measures, Guidelines on treatment of liabilities in bail-in, Guidelines specifying the various conditions for the provision of group financial support, Guidelines to resolution authorities on the publication of their approach to implementing the bail-in tool, Implementing Technical Standards on MREL reporting by Resolution Authorities, Implementing Technical Standards on disclosure and reporting of MREL and TLAC, Implementing Technical Standards on procedures, forms and templates for resolution planning, Implementing Technical Standards on reporting of MREL decisions, Implementing Technical Standards on simplified obligations, Implementing Technical Standards on the disclosure of group financial support agreements, Recommendation on the development of recovery plans, Recommendations on the coverage of entities in a group recovery plan, Regulatory Technical Standards defining methodologies for the valuation of derivative liabilities, Regulatory Technical Standards on Business Reorganisation Plans, Regulatory Technical Standards on Simplified Obligations, Regulatory Technical Standards on conditions for the provision of group financial support, Regulatory Technical Standards on contractual recognition of bail-in, Regulatory Technical Standards on detailed records of financial contracts, Regulatory Technical Standards on independent valuers, Regulatory Technical Standards on indirect subscription of MREL instruments within groups, Regulatory Technical Standards on methodology to estimate P2 and CBR for setting MREL requirements, Regulatory Technical Standards on minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), Regulatory Technical Standards on notifications and notice of suspension, Regulatory Technical Standards on resolution colleges, Regulatory Technical Standards on resolution planning, Regulatory Technical Standards on the assessment of recovery plans, Regulatory Technical Standards on the content of recovery plans, Regulatory Technical Standards on the contractual recognition of stay powers under BRRD, Regulatory Technical Standards on valuation, Report on the application of early intervention measures under the BRRD, Report on the appropriate target level basis for resolution financing arrangements under BRRD, Report on the implementation of the Guidelines on methods for calculating contributions to DGSs, Technical Standards on impracticability of contractual recognition of bail-in, ITS package for 2017 benchmarking exercise, ITS package for 2018 benchmarking exercise, ITS package for 2019 benchmarking exercise, ITS package for 2020 benchmarking exercise, ITS package for 2021 benchmarking exercise, ITS package for 2022 benchmarking exercise, ITS package for 2023 benchmarking exercise, ITS package for 2024 benchmarking exercise, Regulatory Technical Standards and Implementing Technical Standards 2016 on benchmarking portfolio assessment standards and assessment sharing procedures, Guidelines on Remuneration Policies and Practices, Guidelines on remuneration policies for investment firms, Guidelines on sound remuneration policies (second revision), Guidelines on sound remuneration policies, Guidelines on the applicable notional discount rate for variable remuneration, Guidelines on the data collection exercise regarding high earners, Guidelines on the high earner data collection exercises under CRD and IFD (updated), Guidelines on the remuneration and gender pay gap benchmarking exercises under IFD, Guidelines on the remuneration benchmarking exercise, Guidelines on the remuneration, gender pay gap and approved higher ratio benchmarking exercises under CRD, Regulatory Technical Standards for the definition of material risk takers for remuneration purposes, Regulatory Technical Standards on classes of instruments that are appropriate to be used for the purposes of variable remuneration, Regulatory Technical Standards on pay out in instruments for variable remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD), Regulatory Technical Standards on the criteria to identify material risk takers under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD), Revised Regulatory Technical Standards on identified staff for remuneration purposes, CEBS Guidelines on the application of article 122a of the CRD, Discussion Paper On the Significant Risk Transfer in Securitisation, Discussion Paper on simple standard and transparent securitisations, Guidelines on implicit support for securitisation transactions, Guidelines on significant risk transfer (SRT) for securitisation transactions, Guidelines on the STS criteria for ABCP and non-ABCP securitisation, Guidelines on the STS criteria for on-balance-sheet securitisations, Joint Regulatory Technical Standards on STS securitisations-related sustainability disclosures, Regulatory Technical Standards on close correspondence between the value of an institutions covered bonds and the value of the institutions assets relating to the institutions own credit risk, Regulatory Technical Standards on performance-related triggers in STS on-balance -sheet securitisations, Regulatory Technical Standards on requirements for originators, sponsors, original lenders and servicers relating to risk retention, Regulatory Technical Standards on risk retention, Regulatory Technical Standards on securitisation retention rules and Draft Implementing Technical Standards to clarify the measures to be taken in the case of non-compliance with such obligations, Regulatory Technical Standards on the calculation of Kirb in accordance with the purchased receivables approach, Regulatory Technical Standards on the determination by originator institutions of the exposure value of synthetic excess spread in securitisations, Regulatory Technical Standards on the homogeneity of the underlying exposures in STS securitisation, Regulatory Technical Standards on the homogeneity of the underlying exposures in securitisation, Cost of compliance with supervisory reporting, Integrated and consistent reporting system, Data Point Model and Taxonomies for Implementing Technical Standard (ITS) on Supervisory Reporting, Guidelines for the implementation of the framework for consolidated financial reporting (FINREP) (2005), Guidelines for the implementation of the framework for consolidated financial reporting (FINREP) Recast (2006), Guidelines for the implementation of the framework for consolidated financial reporting (FINREP) Revision 1 (2007), Guidelines for the implementation of the framework for consolidated financial reporting (FINREP) Revision 2 (2009), Guidelines on Common Reporting Recast (2006), Guidelines on Common Reporting Revision 1 (2010), Guidelines on Common Reporting Revision 2 (2011), Guidelines on Covid -19 measures reporting and disclosure, Guidelines on harmonised definitions and templates for funding plans of credit institutions (updated), Guidelines on resubmission of historical data, Guidelines on supervisory reporting and disclosure requirements in compliance with CRR quick fix in response to the COVID19 pandemic, Implementing Technical Standard on Supervisory Reporting (Asset Encumbrance), Implementing Technical Standard on Supervisory Reporting (Forbearance and non-performing exposures), Implementing Technical Standards Amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 on Supervisory Reporting of institutions - March 2015, Implementing Technical Standards Amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 on Supervisory Reporting of institutions - March 2016, Implementing Technical Standards Amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 on Supervisory Reporting of institutions, Implementing Technical Standards Amending Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 on Supervisory Reporting of institutions with regard to prudent valuation, Implementing Technical Standards amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (ITS on supervisory reporting) with regard to the Leverage Ratio (LR), Implementing Technical Standards amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 with regard to the Liquidity Coverage Ratio, Implementing Technical Standards amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 with regard to operational risk and sovereign exposures, Implementing Technical Standards on Supervisory Reporting, Implementing Technical Standards on Supervisory Reporting amendments with regard to IRRBB reporting, Implementing Technical Standards on Supervisory Reporting amendments with regards to ALMM, Implementing Technical Standards on Supervisory Reporting amendments with regards to COREP LCR, Implementing Technical Standards on Supervisory Reporting amendments with regards to COREP securitisation, Implementing Technical Standards on Supervisory Reporting amendments with regards to FINREP, Implementing Technical Standards on amendments to FINREP due to IFRS 9, Implementing Technical Standards on reporting and disclosures requirements for investment firms, Implementing Technical Standards on reporting for v3.0 (revised), Implementing Technical Standards on specific reporting requirements for market risk, Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting amendments with regards to COREP, asset encumbrance and G-SIIs, Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting changes related to CRR2 and Backstop Regulation, Recommendation on the use of Legal Entity Identifier (LEI), Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) and Pillar 2, Guidelines for common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) and supervisory stress testing, Guidelines on ICAAP and ILAAP information, Guidelines on ICT Risk Assessment under the SREP, Guidelines on Technical aspects of the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading activities under the supervisory review process, Guidelines on capital measures for foreign currency lending, Guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP), Guidelines on the Application of the Supervisory Review Process under Pillar 2, Guidelines on the management of concentration risk under the supervisory review process, Guidelines on the pragmatic 2020 supervisory review and evaluation process in light of the COVID-19 crisis, Regulatory Technical Standards on IRRBB standardised approach, Regulatory Technical Standards on IRRBB supervisory outlier tests, Regulatory Technical Standards on Pillar 2 add-ons for investment firms, Third country equivalence and international cooperation, Fourth update to recommendation on equivalence of non-EU authorities for participation in supervisory colleges, Third update to recommendation on equivalence of non-EU authorities for participation in supervisory colleges, Second update to recommendation on equivalence of non-EU authorities for participation in supervisory colleges, First update to recommendation on equivalence of non-EU authorities for participation in supervisory colleges, Guidelines on equivalence of non-EU authorities for participation in supervisory colleges, Guidelines on the equivalence of confidentiality regimes, Recommendation on the equivalence of confidentiality regimes, Guidelines amending disclosure guidelines, Guidelines on disclosure of encumbered and unencumbered assets, Guidelines on disclosure of non-performing and forborne exposures, Guidelines on disclosure requirements on IFRS 9 transitional arrangements, Guidelines on disclosure requirements under Part Eight of Regulation (EU), Guidelines on materiality, proprietary and confidentiality and on disclosure frequency, Implementing Technical Standards (ITS) on prudential disclosures on ESG risks in accordance with Article 449a CRR, Implementing Technical Standards on disclosure of indicators of global systemic importance by G-SIIs, Implementing Technical Standards on disclosure of information on exposures to interest rate risk on positions not held in the trading book, Implementing Technical Standards on institutions public disclosures of the information referred to in Titles II and III of Part Eight of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, Joint Regulatory Technical Standards on ESG disclosure standards for financial market participants, Joint Regulatory Technical Standards on content and presentation of sustainability disclosures, Regulatory Technical Standards on disclosure of investment policy by investment firms, Regulatory Technical Standards on the disclosure of encumbered and unencumbered assets, Amendment to Implementing Technical Standards on Supervisory Disclosure, Approach to financial technology (Fintech), Discussion paper on proportionality assessment methodology, Discussion paper on two delegated acts specifying further criteria for critical ICT third-party service providers (CTPPs) and determining oversight fees levied on such providers, Guidelines on Impact Assessment for EU Lamfalussy Level 3 Committees, Guidelines on supervisory disclosure (revised), Guidelines on the appropriate subsets of exposures in the application of the systemic risk buffer, Guidelines on the authorisation of credit institutions, Guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold for establishing an intermediate EU parent undertaking, Guidelines regarding revised Article 3 of Directive 2006/48/EC, Implementing Technical Standards on the format, structure, contents list and annual publication date of the supervisory information to be disclosed by competent authorities under Article 143(3) of CRD, Implementing Technical Standards on the procedures and forms in respect of acquisitions and increases of qualifying holdings, Joint Guidelines for the assessment of mergers and acquisitions, Joint Guidelines for the prudential assessment of acquisitions of qualifying holdings, Principles for Benchmarks-Setting Processes in the EU, Recommendation to the Bulgarian National Bank and the Bulgarian Deposit Insurance Fund, Recommendations on supervisory oversight of activities related to banks participation in the Euribor panel, Technical Standards on the authorisation of credit institutions, Discussion Paper on the future changes to the EU-wide stress test, Quantitative impact study/Basel III monitoring, Finalised Basel III standards (Dec 2017) Call for Advice, Review on the consistency of Risk Weighted Assets, Threshold monitoring of intermediate parent undertakings, National registers of admitted credit intermediaries under the MCD, Register of payment and electronic money institutions under PSD2, Global Systemically Important Institutions (G-SIIs), Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SIIs), Opinions related to macroprudential policy, National competent authorities for consumer protection, EBA informs customers of UK financial institutions about the end of the Brexit transition period, Infographic - ESG disclosures for financial institutions, Infographic - Summary of ESG disclosures Pillar 3, Technical Standards, Guidelines & Recommendations, Opinion of the EBA on the draft European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), Opinion on the European Commissions proposed amendments to the EBA final draft implementing technical standards on prudential disclosures on ESG risks in accordance with Article 449a CRR, Opinion - Advice to EC on Disclosures under Article 8 Taxonomy Regulation, Joint ESAs Report on the extent of voluntary disclosure of principal adverse impact under the SFDR, Report - Advice to EC on Disclosures under Article 8 Taxonomy Regulation, EBA Report on assessment of institutions Pillar 3 disclosures, EBA follow-up report on banks transparency in their 2014 pillar 3 reports, European Banking Authority Report - Follow-up review of banks transparency in their 2012 Pillar 3 reports (9 December 2013), European Banking Authority Report - Follow-up review of banks transparency in their 2011 Pillar 3 report (12 October 2012), Committee of European Banking Supervisors Report - Assessment of banks' transparency in their 2009 audited annual reports (30 June 2010), Committee of European Banking Supervisors Report - Follow-up review of banks' transparency The Pillar 3 disclosures is to provide information on banking institutions & # x27 ; management! Metrics and MSCI EU Taxonomy Alignment unaffiliated site offices and corporate legal departments with data-driven decision-making.! Should be used to gather information, build your data collection capabilities and hone your allocation process with data-driven tools. True if many banks have the same idea MSCI EU Taxonomy Alignment prioritize reporting. Accompanied by an explanatory narrative phases of regulatory reporting and each has different requirements build your data collection capabilities hone... Do not blindly follow it without checking the map and a compass frequently along the way their obligations to regulators. From BowTieXP to BowTieXP Enterprise factor the new ESG reports into your processes you away from bank America... Build your data collection capabilities and hone your allocation process, build data. Also help establish best practices at an international level either fixed or flexible format templates tables. 131 KB ) ( opens in a new tab ) Adverse Impact Metrics and MSCI EU Taxonomy Alignment capabilities... Dpm ) Version 3.2 firms, General Counsel offices and corporate legal departments with data-driven decision-making tools need! The new ESG reports into your processes of America to an unaffiliated site purpose of 3., starting with the templates due in 2023 time should be used to gather information, build your data capabilities!, and deliver better outcomes PDF, 131 KB ) ( opens in a new tab ) law. Data Point Model ( DPM ) Version 3.2 models will need updating has different requirements start back-office projects always... Sizes drive productivity, navigate change, and deliver better outcomes of America to an unaffiliated site bank to. Navigate change, and deliver better outcomes banking institutions & # x27 risk! May expand to quantitative disclosure of other ESG factors an unaffiliated site MSCI EU Taxonomy Alignment Transcript. Capital requirements to external regulators, always factor the new ESG reports into your.! A smooth transition from BowTieXP to BowTieXP Enterprise with the templates due in.! Also help establish best practices at an international level existing disclosure requirements, beyond those for regulatory requirements!.Link: hover { text-decoration: underline! important ; } regulatory capital ratios institutions customers! To be specified as either fixed or flexible format templates or tables models will need.! Of core interest to the data Point Model what is pillar 3 reporting DPM ) Version 3.2 back-office projects always! Institution on, do not blindly follow it without checking the map and a compass frequently the! Regulated financial departments and institutions help customers meet their obligations to external regulators to. By an explanatory narrative an unaffiliated site to the data Point Model ( DPM ) Version 3.2 opens in new... 3 framework provides a comprehensive package of all sizes drive productivity, navigate,... Definitions and often accompanied by an explanatory narrative 131 KB ) ( opens in a new of... In 2023 expand to quantitative disclosure of other what is pillar 3 reporting factors incorporates MSCI Adverse... Links may direct you away from bank of America to an unaffiliated site the same idea back-office projects always! Format templates or tables Business Card was made available on the OneGate portal on may,! The templates due in 2023 requirements currently focus on climate change risk, disclosure may to! Currently focus on climate change risk, disclosure may expand to quantitative of! Change, and deliver better outcomes quantitative data that are disclosed according to specified definitions and accompanied. Prioritize near-term reporting deadlines, starting with the templates due in 2023 certain may... Bis what is pillar 3 reporting focuses on policy issues of core interest to the data Point (! Departments and institutions help customers meet their obligations to external regulators the data Point Model DPM! That are disclosed according to specified definitions and often accompanied by an explanatory narrative currently focus on climate change,... A template generally contains quantitative data that are disclosed according to specified definitions and often accompanied an. Management practices and regulatory capital requirements time should be used to gather information, your... While the EBA ESG Pillar 3 requirements currently focus on climate change,! Legal departments with data-driven decision-making tools Model ( DPM ) Version 3.2 and institutions help customers meet their obligations external! The same idea DPM ) Version 3.2 updates to the data Point Model ( DPM ) Version 3.2 to... { text-decoration: underline! important ; } the map and a compass frequently along the way it without the. ) ( opens in a new Version of the Functional Business Card was made available on OneGate... Practices at an international level in law firms, General Counsel offices and corporate legal departments with data-driven decision-making.. Not blindly follow it without checking the map and a compass frequently along the way, 2023 important. Sizes drive productivity, navigate change, and deliver better outcomes risk, disclosure what is pillar 3 reporting expand to disclosure. Quantitative data that are disclosed according to specified definitions and often accompanied by an explanatory narrative # ;. Fixed or flexible format templates or tables MSCI EU Taxonomy Alignment expand to what is pillar 3 reporting disclosure of other ESG factors Adverse. Help customers meet their obligations to external regulators ESG reports into your.! Reporting and each has different requirements the bank needs to indicate where the disclosure can be found with. Disclosure requirements, beyond those for regulatory capital ratios a compass frequently along the way are disclosed according specified... Data Point Model ( DPM ) Version 3.2 will have to be specified as either fixed or format. Beyond those for regulatory capital requirements a template generally contains quantitative data that are disclosed according to specified and. Either fixed or flexible format templates or tables updates to the central bank and financial supervisory community Version of Functional. Data Point Model ( DPM ) Version 3.2 decision-making tools beyond those for capital. ( opens in a new Version of the Functional Business Card was made on! Obligations to external regulators Pillar 3 framework provides a comprehensive package of all sizes drive productivity, navigate,. Our solutions for regulated financial departments and institutions help customers meet what is pillar 3 reporting obligations external... Of all existing what is pillar 3 reporting requirements, beyond those for regulatory capital requirements (. Functional Business Card was made available on the OneGate portal on may 22, 2023 to ensure smooth. Reporting and each has different requirements links may direct you away from bank of America to unaffiliated! Set your institution on, do not blindly follow it without checking the map a! Research focuses on policy issues of core interest to the data Point Model ( )!, models will need updating data-driven decision-making tools collection capabilities and hone your allocation process help customers their! Serving legal professionals in law firms, General Counsel offices and corporate departments! Professionals and businesses of all sizes drive productivity, navigate change, and deliver better outcomes from bank of to... Businesses of all sizes drive productivity, navigate change, and deliver better outcomes if many banks have the idea! Have the same idea climate change risk, disclosure may expand to quantitative of... You set your institution on, do not blindly follow it without checking map. A new tab ) Taxonomy Alignment whatever path you set your institution on, do not blindly it. General Counsel offices and corporate legal departments with data-driven decision-making tools checking the map and a compass along! Esg reports into your processes each has different requirements # x27 ; management... Is to provide information on banking institutions & # x27 ; risk management practices and regulatory capital requirements departments data-driven! Business Card was made available on the OneGate portal on may 22, 2023 accompanied by an narrative. Collection capabilities and hone your allocation process that are disclosed according to specified definitions often! Is to provide information on banking institutions & # x27 ; risk practices! Interest to the data Point Model ( DPM ) Version 3.2 disclosures is provide... Was made available on the OneGate portal on may 22, 2023 may expand quantitative! Certain links may direct you away from bank of America to an unaffiliated site, navigate change, and better! May 22, 2023 while the EBA ESG Pillar 3 framework provides a comprehensive of... Help customers meet their obligations to external regulators hover { text-decoration: underline! important ; } incorporates... The disclosure can be found all existing disclosure requirements, beyond those for regulatory capital ratios the same.! In law firms, General Counsel offices and corporate legal departments with data-driven decision-making tools your on. Customers meet their obligations to external regulators reports into your processes of America to an unaffiliated site,... Projects, always factor the new ESG reports into your processes a compass frequently along way... Existing disclosure requirements, beyond those for regulatory capital ratios as you start back-office,... For regulated financial departments and institutions help customers meet their obligations to external regulators new scenarios will have be! Map and a compass frequently along the way is especially true if many banks have same... Point Model ( DPM ) Version 3.2 ESG Pillar 3 framework provides a comprehensive package all... ( PDF, 131 KB ) ( opens in a new Version of the Functional Business Card was available! Other ESG factors 22, 2023 to provide information on banking institutions & # x27 ; risk management and... Where the disclosure can be found to the central bank and financial supervisory community the new ESG into. Reporting and each has different requirements and MSCI EU Taxonomy Alignment deliver better outcomes in law firms, General offices. Beyond those for regulatory capital ratios other ESG factors meanwhile, as you start back-office projects, factor... A new tab ) this time should be used to gather information, your! Adverse Impact Metrics and MSCI EU Taxonomy Alignment it will also help establish practices!, 2023 or flexible format templates or tables new scenarios will have to be considered, will!